June 21, 2017
We were delighted to sponsor the Pudsey Legal 10k race on Sunday 18 June 2017.
We were delighted to sponsor the Pudsey Legal 10k race on Sunday 18 June 2017.
Do you run your own business?
How much time do you spend chasing bad debts?
Our Business and Commercial law solicitor, Kiran Virdee, explains the impact of bad debtors on a business and what we can do to support you when this situation arises:
Pudsey Carnival took place on Saturday 20 May this year. The question is 'did it rain?'
Do you run your own business? Do you have a business distaster recovery plan?
Carolyn Monaghan explains how a business Lasting Power of Attorney can help your business overcome an emergency.
It is generally assumed that when you make a Will you can leave your estate to whomever you wish.
Here, our Wills specialist, Carolyn Monaghan explained why it is not always that straightforward.
Family Law expert, Helen Starmer discusses some myths surrounding matrimonial issues
Being appointed as an executor in a Will carries responsibilities.
Wills & Probate specialist, Carolyn Monghan, looks at the potential pitfalls faced by executors when the estate is insolvent.
When employment ends, for example through redundancy, often the employer will ask the employee to sign a 'Settlement Agreement' to bring an end to the contract.
Our Business & Commercial Law specialist, Kiran Virdee explains what these are.
Kiran Virdee explains the importance of getting your business terms and conditions right.
Now that more of us are living longer, the prospect of needing to go into a care home looms larger in most of our minds. Most of us feel that we have worked hard to have something to leave for the children and we don’t want it all to go on paying for years and years of care. But there are a lot of myths surrounding paying for care fees, and it’s worth putting these concerns into perspective.
Currently there are about 291,000 people living in care homes, representing about 3.2% of over-65s. This percentage has been roughly stable since 2001. This shows that the vast majority of us will never go into a care home.
If we do, many people fear that the local authority will immediately take the house to pay for it. However, this is not the case. Firstly, any income you have – state pension, occupational pension, state benefits – will first be used to fund your care. If there is a shortfall, a financial assessment will be made, looking at how much capital the person going into care has. If the house is needed for the person’s spouse to live in, it will not count as part of this assessment, and there are other assets that may be disregarded too. If the person is assessed as having more than £23,250 in capital, the Local Authority will not contribute to care fees, and will leave it up to the person to fund their own care. If the person has capital between £14,250 and £23,250, then the Local Authority will make a contribution to the fees.
Many people think that the only solution to avoid the sale of the house is to give it to the children. But this has its own drawbacks – your children may get divorced, or go bankrupt, giving third parties a right to a share of your home. In addition, the Local Authority can ignore a gift if they can show that it was made only or mainly to avoid care fees, and treat you as still owning the property.
There are ways for joint owners of a house to use a trust in their wills to protect at least half of the house for the children. Every person’s circumstances are different, and it is always wise to take legal and/or financial advice when making plans for your future.
Please call me if you would like to make an appointment for advice on any aspect of this article.
You may be thinking that after paying out for all those children essentials like toys, clothes and birthday parties there would be nothing left to leave in your Will. But remember - a Will doesn’t just cover your financial wishes.
It’s something we don’t like to think about, but if you don’t make a Will at all and both you and your partner die, any member of your family can apply for parental responsibility for your children – imagine Great Auntie Rose, who is lovely but no match for your boisterous little terrors, or what if both sets of grandparents wanted responsibility? This could set off world war three! If you make a will with provision for the children, you can make your own wishes clear to your family and make sure your children have the most suitable guardians.
If there is any money, the law says that if you have no spouse, or your spouse has died before you, the money will be divided equally between your children and will be held in trust until each child reaches the age of 18. You may prefer that the children have to wait until they are 21 – or maybe 30 – before they can take control of the money.
For some families, it may be fairer not to divide the money equally. For example, if you have a disabled child who may have greater financial needs, you might wish to give that child a larger inheritance.
There might be a large age gap, say, one child is 10 and the other 20. Here, you may wish to leave more to the 10-year-old to help the guardian with bringing a young child up – you can make provision in the Will that this changes to an equal share when the youngest reaches 18.
If your family is a complex one, where you each have children from a first marriage and you also have children together, the need to make a Will is even more important. If you have raised your blended family together for some years, you probably want to keep them together if you both die, but the former spouses’ families may have other ideas. Also your assets may not pass equally to the children - step-children are not entitled to any assets if a step-parent dies without making a Will, so who gets what will depend on the accident of who dies first.
If you make a Will, you can avoid all of these problems and make sure that your children are secure.
Please do call me to arrange an appointment if you are thinking of making your first Will or updating an existing one.
The way you own your home could have implications you might not be aware of.
It is important to understand how this could affect you, particularly in relation to your inheritance planning.
When two or more people own property together, there are two ways they can hold the property:
Beneficial joint tenants - if one of the owners dies, the survivor will own the whole property.
Tenants in common - each owner owns a share of the property, which can then pass to whoever they wish under the terms of their will.
As with most things, there can be pros and cons to each method and your own circumstances can often dictate which is most advantageous for you.
It is possible to change from one method to the other. If you hold a property as beneficial joint tenants, you could make a declaration (known as severing the tenancy) to convert your ownership into tenants in common.
If the ownership is by way of tenants in common you could transfer to beneficial joint tenants (so long as all the owners agree) by making a Declaration of Trust.
Examples of how the different methods can affect you can include:
If a couple separate, one may decide to sever the joint tenancy so as to protect their share of the property and ensure it passes under the terms of their will, rather than automatically to the other joint owner.
A married couple may choose to hold the property as tenants in common for various reasons:
Tax – you don’t have to own equal shares in your property, and there may be tax advantages in holding the property in unequal shares.
Janet, a company director, pays 45% tax. John is a full-time house-husband with no income from employment. They own a second home which they rent out at £1,000 per month. Whilst they own this house as beneficial joint tenants, they are each entitled to half of any rental income. John pays 20% tax on his share (£100 per month), but Janet has to pay 45% on hers (£225 per month).
Securing the children’s inheritance - this can be threatened either by care home fees, or perhaps by the remarriage of a surviving partner who is not the parent of the children. If the home is owned as tenants in common, each partner can make a will which leaves their half share in trust on whatever terms they wish.
Mick and Joan own their home as tenants in common. Theirs is a second marriage, and each has children from their first marriage. They want to make sure that their own children get their share of the house. They have made wills which, in the event of the death of one of them, leaves their share of the house in trust for their children, but with a right for the surviving spouse to live in the house for the rest of their life.
If you would like further advice on any aspect of this article, please do call me to arrange an appointment.
I thought I would use our blog to introduce myself as Pudsey Legal's new Private Client specialist lawyer.
I have many years’ experience of advising clients on “getting their affairs in order”. This may mean making a Lasting Power of Attorney, a Will, or perhaps setting up a trust to protect the family home or a disabled relative. I am a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners.
To start things off I will explain why it is important to consider making a Will.
What happens if I don’t make a will? .
If you die without having made a Will, you are said to have died “intestate”, and as you have not made clear how you would like your estate distributed, there are legal rules which must be followed to distribute your estate.
The law says that if you are married or in a civil partnership with your partner, and also have children, then your partner will take the first £250,000 of your estate, plus half of the remainder, while the children will inherit the other half of the remainder.
If you have no partner, your children will take everything equally between them.
If you have no partner or children, then the next nearest relative or relatives will get everything, in the following order of priority:
If you have none of these relatives, then everything will pass to the Crown.
These days, there is really no such thing as a typical family. A couple may be married, in a civil partnership or just living together. They may have children from previous relationships, shared children, adopted children, or any combination.
Take Fred and Wilma – they have lived together for 15 years. They have no children together, but Wilma has a daughter from a previous relationship, whom Fred has brought up since she was 2 years old. When Fred dies, his entire estate passes to his brother Bill, who has not spoken to Fred for 20 years.
Barney and Betty, on the other hand, are married. Barney has four children from his previous relationship, and Betty has one child from hers. When Barney dies, there is only £200,000 in his estate and Betty inherits it all. Sadly, Betty dies just 6 weeks later, without having made a Will. Her daughter inherits everything.
The laws of intestacy can have some very unfair consequences. Making a Will can avoid a lot of family trauma.
Even if you have already made a Will, it is important to think about whether it is up to date. Family circumstances change constantly and even a small change could have a dramatic effect on an out of date Will.
If you do want any advice on any of the points raised in this blog, please do call to make an appointment to see me.
As we all know, moving home can be a stressful experience. If you’re putting your house on the market, it’s natural to want to agree a sale as quickly as possible (and for the best price.)
This is where the old adage ‘Fail to prepare – prepare to fail’ comes to mind. Why? Because it also applies to selling your home - presentation is key if you want to increase your chances of that quick sale.
It’s not just about giving your home ‘kerb appeal.’ It’s about making your home somewhere potential buyers can easily visualise living in themselves.
This is no ‘one size fits all’ solution to this, people have different views, but there are a few simple rules we can follow to improve our chances of that quick sale:
...... and finally, smile - be friendly and cheerful. Creating a bond with the viewer might just tip the balance.
Good luck and do give me a call for a quote when you’ve agreed that sale. We'll do our best to make sure the process goes as smoothly as possible!
As many people will know, legal aid has been abolished for many family law matters and this, in turn, has led to a steep rise in ‘Litigants in Person - in other words people representing themselves in the family law courts.
A couple of recent case have caught my eye and I thought I would share these with you as, perhaps, they do highlight the need for legal advice.
The first involved a couple who had been married for over 20 years and had substantial assets. Following the divorce, the husband was ordered to pay the wife a considerable sum.
The husband now sought to alter the terms of a divorce financial settlement on the basis that his ex-wife was now living with another man (it is interesting to note that he represented himself at the hearing.)
The husband argued that that his ex-wife and new partner are effectively living as ‘husband and wife’ and, therefore, he should pay a lesser sum - in effect reducing his support for her.
The wife argued that she was anxious to remain financially independent and should not have to rely on her new partner.
The Court agreed with her, ruling that the new relationship did not negate the husband’s legal obligation to his former wife.
The second involved an ex-husband who has won the right from the Court of Appeal to challenge the validity of his ex-mother-in-law’s Will.
The case centred on the divorce settlement between the parties which included a provision that if the wife inherited more than £100,000 from her mother, any sum over the £100,000 be split equally between the husband and wife.
Following the mother’s death, the Will left £100,000 to the wife with the remainder (approx. £150,000) going to her grandchildren.
The husband launched a challenge to this, including alleging the Will had been forged in an attempt to get around the divorce settlement.
Initially he lost as he was found not to have sufficient interest in the estate to bring a claim.
On appeal, the wife argued that only those with the right to administer an estate could challenge a Will. As such, the husband was a ‘stranger to the estate’ as he did not have this right.
The Court of Appeal rejected the wife’s argument, commenting ‘justice in the general sense requires the husband to bring a probate claim’ and that ‘he is not a mere busybody. He has a real interest in challenging the validity of the Will.’
The matter will now be heard as a formal challenge and it will be interesting to see the outcome.
However, the ruling does potentially open the doors a little further for those who previously had no right to challenge Wills in the future.
If you would like advice regarding any of the issues in this article, do get in touch to make an appointment.